Organized Labor

Issue

   Organized labor (unions) have allowed workers to engage in collective bargaining agreements to attain higher pay, better working conditions, and additional benefits. However, is allowing workers the ability to go on strike and "strong arm" their employers into accepting their demands that good of a policy for the nation?

Solution

   Unions have contributed to the rising cost of products to the point that some goods have become unattainable and are no longer affordable for the average consumer. For example, the cost of an automobile has risen dramatically over the years due to the higher wages imposed by unions. The auto industry had to consider alternatives such as moving jobs overseas, or fully automating plants with robotics, in order to lower costs and stay competitive.

   Another concern is that workers that go on strike may negatively affect the rest of the nation that don't directly benefit from their negotiations. For example, transportation-related unions (e.g., railway, shipping, trucking) have enormous influence on a wide range of products due to affecting the supply chain. If these transportation-related unions go on strike, it causes a cascading effect on other industries that don't directly benefit from the union's demands. This causes an unfair amount of influence that a particular union has on the rest of the nation.

   From a legal perspective, workers who go on strike with the intention to threaten companies with their demands or their businesses will fail is essentially extortion. Legislation needs to be considered that will allow the Justice Department to file criminal charges against striking workers to prevent this type of intimidation.

   In many countries, union workers are the minority of the population. Why should so few dictate the welfare of everyone else?