top of page
Physics Q&A
How does gravity fit in bubble theory’s quantum-relativistic framework?
Gravity is simply a force of attraction, nothing more and nothing less. That's the beauty of it. In this model, the role of the forces is simply to convey their energies that are then subsequently converted into kinetic energy when absorbed by the particle.
The common bond that the forces share is that kinetic energy is their final result upon a body so that all the forces are able to generate relativistic effects equally in this respect. There is nothing special about gravity other than it was originally dragged into the picture due to the poor analysis of the subject.
How does the neutrino act within the bubble environment?
Weakly interacting particles emit bubble fields, which in turn, induces the probability of sliding by the particle making them difficult to interact with. The difference why a particle interacts with another particle, or not do so, even though in both situations the weakly interactive particle is identical in every way is due to kinetic energy sliding. Some particles are more weakly interactive than others because they emit a stronger wavelength bubble for sliding. This is why the neutrino is so elusive in nature.
Since this model combines quantum mechanics with relativity, what does it accommodate that conventional theory does not?
My model is the only one capable of explaining the various hidden variables associated with the fundamentals of quantum mechanics and relativity.
For example, the spacetime model fails to explain how mass is even capable of affecting the elements of space and time on a fundamental level. After all, one cannot directly observe through a microscope the element of mass affecting the constituents of space and time.
Since spacetime has yet to be proven, there is no direct experimental evidence that the spacetime model is valid. Keep in mind that the concept of relativity is not being questioned here but rather that the spacetime model is unverified towards providing a realistic means of describing such effects. We should continue researching alternatives until one is actually proven experimentally.
My hypothesis derives relativistic effects in three dimensions. That alone is worth consideration and has precedence.
An important difference that my model provides is that every entity is responsible for its own reference frame adjustment. Not the void of space, that somehow magically moves itself and heavenly bodies around, but rather frame adjustments are derived by kinetic energy directly interacting with the interference patterns that develop within the bubble environment layer.
Some may say that unifying relativity with quantum mechanics has already been done, but Dirac only combined the equations (which is a math trick). What is lacking is an actual physical model that generates both effects simultaneously by the same means.
My model accomplishes this with the concept of kinetic energy interacting with the environment where entities are (re)positioned in a system through sliding effects (essentially micro-sliding alone). It is a physical model where the same means generates both relativistic and quantum effects simultaneously. The first model to do so.
Any additional peculiarities associated with the internals of kinetic energy?
Consider the following: how are force carriers converted into kinetic energy when absorbed by a particle?
For the discussion, it doesn't matter if particles are viewed as infinitely small entities since force carriers are still being absorbed and converted into kinetic energy in some manner. What is important is that the subject needs to be further examined to better our understanding of the process.
So, what has to occur for a force carrier (energy that travels through space on its own) to become kinetic energy (energy that stays resident upon a particle)? Is the conversion complex or simplistic? It should be fairly simple since the force carrier's interaction is only with the exterior of the particle. If the conversion process is not overtly complex, does that imply that force carriers are actually a form of kinetic energy itself? If so, does that mean that all particles that naturally travel at the speed of light may actually be a form of kinetic energy with some minor characteristic differences?
Once absorbed, how does the energy propagate upon the particle? Since matter is contiguous at that magnification level, is it possible that the energy propagates via shearing so that the absorbed section of the particle affects neighboring areas? If enough energy is absorbed to saturate the entire particle then inertia is overcome and the newly absorbed energy may combine with the resident kinetic energy. If this is the case then what prevents the absorbed energy from interacting with the resident kinetic energy before inertia is fully resolved? How is that prevented?
Or, if inertia is greater and cannot be overcome then is the absorbed energy destroyed by retro-shearing in the opposite direction? If that is the case then why doesn't forward shearing destroy the absorbed energy as well? If the absorbed energy is not destroyed then is it retro-sheared back to its point of absorption? What occurs then? Is the energy ignobly dumped into space as if the universe acts as a gigantic garbage dump of semi-processed and regurgitated energy? If so, then what if another particle happens to travel across it? Would it accidentally pick it up while absorbing other force carriers at that location?
Whatever processes are involved in converting field energy into resident kinetic energy, the absorption process would have to be fairly quick in order to process the vast multitude of force carriers that exist at any given location. Just think about it. Every force carrier would have to be processed independently without interfering with each other, and uniquely processed, one after another at incredible speed.
When considering the enormous number of fields that exist at any given location, some would say that it is nearly impossible for an error not to occur during this incredible amount of processing. Especially, when considering the unknown number of distant fields that are not strong enough to overcome a particle's inertia that are processed, but not observed by motion.
Not to mention other possible errors such as: velocity (higher velocities may result in less time to process all the fields at a particular location), alignment of kinetic energy's vector compared to the absorbed energy's vector (similar/differing alignments may result in faster/slower processing), saturation of the particle due to kinetic energy's density (making it easier/difficult for future absorption), weaker fields piggybacking off of stronger fields (when two or more fields are accidentally absorbed simultaneously, or absorbing fields from different directions at the same time), etc. Perhaps, a healthy margin of error should be considered when evaluating such things on a cosmic scale.
While considering these errors, there also may be an overriding issue with the local group of fields having priority compared to the more distant fields. Or, that the distant fields are only semi-processed, or perhaps not processed at all, due to time constraints.
The multitude of variations due to all of these effects may result in floating "phantom zones" occurring in space where entities seem to be affected by something that doesn't actually exist, but appear to do so. In that, entities may be affected in a greater or lesser manner than what they normally should for that particular location in space.
Could this be the reason for the shift towards the Great Attractor? Or dark matter? Or different ages of the universe?
How does the classical nature of bubble theory reflect the structure of the atom?
In the quantum-relativistic ether model, the formation of the atomic shells or energy levels is due to a peculiar bubble formation caused by the proton's/antiproton's three-quark combination.
The quarks are aligned such that their aggregate bubble formation propagates outward in a spiral-like fashion that alternates between the two different zones of sliding (forward-/cross-sliding zones). Electrons forward-slide to a higher/lower shell when bubble interference patterns dictate such (due to the change in the energized particle's bubble field), and cross-slide within the respective shell layer generating the appropriate wave effect (electron cloud phenomenon).
The one-to-one pairing of a proton and electron along with the photon emission, however, is due to another effect that is described below when discussing dark matter.
How does this classical model take into account the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?
A particle's wavelength bubble establishes a "random" condition in a system since a particle's position changes within the wavelength bubble whenever the entity moves forward. This causes the particle's location to be uncertain within a given system even though the process is intrinsically deterministic by nature.
For an analogy how a random condition like this may be natively deterministic is somewhat similar to how the interior of a planet may reverse its magnetic poles. Depending upon the particular makeup of the magma, the mineral composition at the time determines the specific alignment of the planet's magnetic field. Similarly, certain internal processes may be involved that affects a particle's decision to move in a random direction within the wavelength bubble whenever it moves forward. It appears to be uncertain, but in truth, is intrinsically deterministic if knowledge of the internal mechanism is known.
However, uncertainty in the sense of being a native undefined physical state in quantum systems is not valid, and such may be shown to be nonsensical simply by considering the following philosophical argument.
At the time of a particle's fabrication, the parent process (particle/environment) would know the properties of the newly created child since the parent is directly responsible for establishing the child its characteristics. It would be incorrect to assume that the child originally existed in an undefined state since the parent had already performed an observation of the child's properties by bestowing such to it (measurement was performed).
Since the parent process performed a thorough observation of the child's properties and characteristics in their entirety (by granting them), the measurement is more complete and comprehensive than any other form of observation that has ever been performed. It is irrelevant if the parent observation is removed from consideration (e.g., particle annihilation), which is similar to the situation if the first observer of Schrodinger's cat leaves the room and doesn't inform a second observer of the results, the system doesn't reset to an undefined state for the second observer. Once an observation has been performed, measurement has its effect.
Since the properties of the child are well known and fully measured at the moment of its creation, it cannot natively exist in an undefined state.
The only uncertainty that applies to a given situation would be the human observer's lack of knowledge. Not that uncertainty intrinsically exists at the particle level, nor would a human's observation be able to physically alter that state for the universe in any way.
Keep in mind that this parent argument is not intended to prove that the universe is deterministic in nature since my quantum-relativistic ether model accomplishes that effort. Instead, the intent of this parent argument is to present a viable contradiction to the uncertainty principle at its most fundamental level, that of the origin of the undefined state.
If the uncertainty principle is inherently flawed then how may one simultaneously measure both the position and momentum of a particle?
A simultaneous measurement of a particle's position and momentum may be successfully accomplished if offsetting photons were used for the experiment.
A non-demolishing measurement is possible if the emitters were aligned such that each would offset the other’s recoil of the target through the simultaneous emission of the photons. By using counteracting photons, the recoil of the target would cancel out to allow for a simultaneous measurement of both position and momentum. The recoil is just kinetic energy after all.
The advantage that my model may offer to this situation is that by collapsing the individual wavelength bubbles, any misalignment of the components with each other would be kept at a minimum.
If this was not taken into consideration, a successful simultaneous measurement may still be accomplished by the repetition of trial and error in order to attain the proper alignment and synchronization of the entire system. Conducting a nano experiment near absolute zero would help minimize misalignment as well.
How does this new theory consider dark matter?
Dark matter may not be a separate entity as commonly thought but actually is an extension of ordinary matter that reaches into the lower ether layers. What we know as an electron is actually only the topmost representation of a continuous blob that extends into the lower ether layers as a single object. This blob particle that exists across multiple ether layers is what we know of as dark matter.
What we observe as the "gravitational pull" by dark matter is actually due to the blob's lower extension having an effect on the upper reaches of itself as ordinary matter. Of ordinary matter appearing to be pushed/pulled rather than the actual absorption of a force carrier which results in motion for an entity without a change in its kinetic energy.
What we observe as quantum fluctuations are actually caused by the undulations at lower ether layers that cause blob tendrils to extend upward into the topmost layer (i.e., "matter suddenly appears out of thin air"). Which is a classical explanation for quantum fluctuations with cause and effect. When particles annihilate each other due to matter-antimatter interactions, they free their lower extensions of themselves that contribute to the overall collection of dark matter in the region that exists without an upper layer representation.
Quantum entanglement effects are caused by matter being physically connected to each other through their lower-layered blob extensions (acting collectively as a whole). So, all entanglement effects are handled in this classical model.
The blob layer is also the reason for the mysterious Great Attractor shift. For the Dipole Repeller region, the eventual elimination of blob material in the area will result in preventing ordinary matter from existing in the upper ether layer which will cause the lack of gravity being felt in the region. This may cause a localized inflationary event in the future (i.e. pocket inflation).
The blob layer also provides insight into particle decay. A free neutron takes about fourteen minutes to break apart but what causes that duration of time and how does the weak nuclear force actually change another particle? The physical transformation initiates in the lower blob layer through blob movements and undulations that populate upward as the weak force that alters the neutron's upper layer blob formation. If there's a variation in a free neutron's decay (neutron lifetime puzzle), it's due to the undulations of the blob layer with the experiment's components and environment conditions. So, in actuality, the weak force is not a force at all but rather an ether construct effect.
The blob layer also provides an explanation how atoms are formed in a classical model. The blob extensions of protons and electrons link up together in the lower ether layer that ensures a one-to-one pairing (as if the nucleus was a sprawling sea urchin catching electron blob tendrils). Adding more protons in the nucleus stretches some blob tendrils to reach further (outer shells) that have smaller-sized receptors (less dense) to reflect why distant shells permit higher energy levels. The outermost valence shell/blob is not as compressed or well-formed as the others which provides some degree of flexibility for the electrons. The density of the proton tendrils in the nucleus determines the specific energy boundaries of the atomic shells that are further defined by the alternating bubble-sliding zones as described earlier (compound effect).
As for the photon emission, there are different possibilities (all of which may occur):
1) [Collision] The energized electron separates from its original proton tendril and as a free electron
connects to a lower shell tendril with an impactful collision sometimes caused by being forcibly caught
by the alternating bubble zone transition [described earlier as a transition from one atomic shell into
another] of which the collision with the lower-leveled tendril triggers a resultant reverberation that
produces a photon blob transmission at the appropriate energy level [energized electron retains its
higher kinetic energy state when it drops shell layers (which is unconventional thought) that is then
conveyed by colliding with the lower shell tendril resulting in the photon blob reverberation]
2) [Proton Exchange] The energized electron remains attached to its original proton tendril that temporarily
stretches the tendril to a higher shell layer resulting in an extra proton tendril at the higher shell,
and at some point, one of the electrons bubble slides to a lower level that causes the two proton
tendrils to forcibly switch places producing a photon blob transmission (as if the two nucleus' tendrils
between the two shell levels forcibly exchanged places due to the electron's downward bubble slide
[tunneling effect] which is a harsh jerking motion) [energized electron may retain its higher kinetic
energy state when it drops shell layers though the photon blob reverberation is actually caused by
the two proton tendrils forcibly exchanging places and is proportional to the difference between their
tendril densities]
3) [Foundation] The energized electron remains attached to its original proton tendril that is stretched to
a higher shell layer, after interplay of the electrons at the higher shell reaches an equilibrium, one
of the electrons eventually drops to a lower shell layer (not from the electron's action but due to the
proton tendrils rearranging themselves to fill the exposed gap in the nucleus' foundation that was
stretched earlier to a higher shell) [energized electron loses its higher kinetic energy state before it
drops shell layers and the process of a proton tendril compressing from an elongated form to a lower
shell version when filling the foundation gap in the nucleus is what produces the photon reverberation
at the appropriate energy level]
The third case (foundation) is the more commonly understood behavior of the atom that any electron when loses its higher kinetic energy state drops to a lower shell automatically, not from it's own action, but rather due to hidden variables acting behind the scenes as mysterious "quantum states". There may be other possibilities for the photon's emission that may be discovered with further research of the blob layer.
In the past, dark matter was previously thought of as something that only caused gravity. What an enormous mistake that was, it is so much more in my multilayered ether model of the universe.
What is the future of this ether model as a true Theory of Everything?
A true Theory of Everything has to provide an explanation of how motion occurs in the universe. At the kinetic energy level of magnification, true motion may not actually occur since the constituent of kinetic energy would require kinetic energy, in of itself, to articulate its own motion. So, how does kinetic energy's constituent move if it requires itself to achieve its own motion?
To avoid this paradox, a new concept called stationary-motion (that of achieving motion without actually physically moving) would have to be derived by the Theory of Everything model.
For an analogy of stationary-motion, consider a pasture of tall grass in which a gust of wind caused patterns to develop upon the grassy surface. The various floating images may appear to move about and interact with each other, but they do so without the grass stalks physically moving from their rooted locations. Or, another analogy would be to view the entire universe as a cathode ray monitor where the pixels remained fixed in place and the images appearing on the screen are artificially induced, but the pixels themselves never physically move from their fixed locations.
In my version of an all-encompassing theory, the universe exists as a three-dimensional, multilayered ether continuum that interacts with itself on a multilevel basis. The patterns that emerge on the topmost layer are achieved through interactions that manifest as ripples or vibrations throughout the ether continuum. The resultant patterns that appear on the topmost layer are what we know as particles, kinetic energy, and space (all of which consist of ether constituents), however, the ether itself doesn't actually physically move nor alter in size.
What we know as motion by particles is artificially simulated by the resultant ether layers interacting with each other that derives the effects of stationary-motion. Somewhat similar to a computer graphics program that combines multiple picture frames in order to produce a single image. An unusual view but this may be the only way to resolve how the constituent of kinetic energy may move without requiring another form of kinetic energy to articulate its motion.
This concept will be further developed when string theory is advanced into being three-dimensional (multiple ether layers replacing the extra dimensions) combined with kinetic energy's constituent resulting in the integrated development of mini-strings. Mini-strings will have a communal shared property to reflect how kinetic energy behaves in a continuum where the mini-strings don't actually move from their rooted ether locations, but rather convey motion as a communal shared property to neighboring mini-strings (as pixels in a stationary-motion environment).
This will be necessary to explain effects such as the conveyance of kinetic energy during a collision (with the mini-string version of the blob layer making kinetic energy "appear" in one body while "disappearing" in the other with the two objects remaining stationary in a pixel-continuum).
Or, how all force carriers are continuously combining and uncombining seamlessly at every location to resolve their virtual aspect of not interfering with each other in a continuum (which also resolves the multitude of errors mentioned above when a force carrier is converted into kinetic energy).
Or, how kinetic energy allows a particle to travel perpetually through space even for billions of years without entropy having an effect on its physical operation for motion (kinetic energy continues without any wear or tear on its self-propulsion mechanism due to the mini-string continuum constantly renewing its motion at every node, like pixels refreshing a moving image on a television screen). Newton may have introduced the idea that motion continues forever but it takes this advanced model to prove it.
Mini-strings are integrated into the continuum as its ether constituents, exhibiting shared communal effects (usually fractional) that project effects in neighboring mini-strings/pixels simulating the ether's multiple layers. This is the basis of a true Theory of Everything that derives particles, kinetic energy, and space as a fully integrated and comprehensive model.
In summary, a true Theory of Everything needs to consider not only how to successfully unify relativity with quantum mechanics by the same means, but also incorporate the constituent of kinetic energy since the means of handling motion and placement in systems is essential for any unified model.
Is faster-than-light interstellar travel possible with this new theory?
On the subject of interstellar travel, an advanced spacecraft may be designed with the following in mind. As mentioned in the Introduction section, every object's motion causes a ripple in the ether (much like how a lily pad or frog causes a ripple upon a pond's surface).
The resultant wake wave physically interacts with kinetic energy's constituent to adjust itself via micro-sliding to ensure that the speed of light is constant. Essentially, kinetic energy remains true to itself to always travel at light speed. Somewhat similar to the mechanical adjustments made by a vehicle's limited slip differential to ensure uniform motion.
This occurs naturally and is how every particle on Earth experiences the same reference frame adjustment whenever a ripple caused by the motion of objects travels thru the planet. The trick is to take advantage of this naturally occurring phenomenon and use it as the primary means of propulsion through space (by allowing the reference frame adjustment do all the work for you).
A clever engineer would surmise that such a means is possible by positioning emitters that are directed inward towards the spacecraft in order to cause ripples strong enough to trigger the micro-sliding effect for every particle. Essentially, causing the craft to momentarily travel at faster-than-light speeds, whether it is hovering in place (counteracting gravity), or moving forward (as a futuristic warp drive).
Which is a pretty slick means of propulsion without rocket engines or their fuel...
bottom of page