top of page
Physics Q&A
How does gravity fit in bubble theory’s quantum-relativistic framework?
Gravity is simply a force of attraction, nothing more and nothing less. That's the beauty of it. In this model, the role of the forces is simply to convey their energies that are then subsequently converted into kinetic energy when absorbed by the particle.
The common bond that the forces share is that kinetic energy is their final result upon a body so that all forces are able to generate relativistic effects equally in this respect. There is nothing special about gravity other than it was originally dragged into the picture due to the poor analysis of the subject.
How does the neutrino act within the bubble environment?
Weakly interacting particles emit bubble fields, which in turn, induces the probability of sliding by the particle making them difficult to interact with. The sliding effect provides the explanation why a particle may interact with another, or not do so, even though in both situations the weakly interactive particle is identical in every way. Some particles are more weakly interactive than others because they emit a stronger wavelength bubble effect. Sliding from kinetic energy is why particles like the neutrino are so elusive in nature.
Since this model combines quantum mechanics with relativity, what does it accommodate that conventional theory does not?
My bubble environment is the only model capable of explaining the various hidden variables associated with the fundamentals of quantum mechanics and relativity.
For example, the spacetime model fails to explain how mass is even capable of affecting the elements of space and time on a fundamental level. After all, one cannot directly observe through a microscope the element of mass affecting the constituents of space and time.
Since spacetime has yet to be proven, there is no direct experimental evidence that the spacetime model is valid. Keep in mind that the concept of relativity is not being questioned here, but rather that the spacetime model is unverified towards providing a realistic means of describing such effects. We should continue researching alternatives until one is actually proven experimentally.
My hypothesis derives relativistic effects in three dimensions. That alone is worth consideration and has precedence.
An important difference that my model provides is that every entity is responsible for its own reference frame adjustment. Not the void of space, that somehow magically moves itself and heavenly bodies around, but rather frame adjustments are derived by kinetic energy directly interacting with the interference patterns that develop within the bubble environment layer.
Some may say that unifying relativity with quantum mechanics has already been done, but Dirac only provided the means of combining the equations (which is essentially a math trick). What is lacking is an actual physical model that generates both effects simultaneously by the same means without conflict.
My model accomplishes this with the concept of kinetic energy interacting with the environment where entities are (re)positioned in a system through sliding effects (essentially micro-sliding alone). It is a physical model where the same means generates both relativistic and quantum effects simultaneously. The first model to do so.
Any additional peculiarities associated with the internals of kinetic energy?
Consider the following: how are force carriers converted into kinetic energy when absorbed by a particle?
For the discussion, it doesn't matter if particles are viewed as infinitely small entities since the force carrier is still being absorbed and converted into kinetic energy. What is important is that the subject needs to be further examined in order to better our understanding of the process.
So, what changes have to occur for a force carrier (energy that travels through space on its own) to become kinetic energy (energy that stays resident upon a particle)? Is the conversion complex or simplistic? It would have to be fairly simple since the force carrier's interaction is only with the exterior of the particle. If not overtly complex, does that imply that force carriers are actually a form of kinetic energy itself? If so, does that mean that any particle that travels at the speed of light may actually be a form of kinetic energy with some minor characteristic differences?
Once absorbed, how does the energy propagate upon the particle? Since matter is contiguous at that magnification level, is it possible that the energy propagates via a shearing effect so that the absorbed section of the particle affects neighboring areas? If enough energy saturates the entire particle then inertia is overcome and the newly absorbed energy may combine with the resident kinetic energy. If this is the case then what prevents the newly absorbed energy from interacting with the resident kinetic energy before inertia is fully resolved? How is that prevented?
Or, if inertia is greater and cannot be overcome then is the absorbed energy destroyed by retro-shearing in the reverse direction? If that is the case then why doesn't forward shearing destroy the absorbed energy as well? If the absorbed energy is not destroyed then is it retro-sheared back to its point of absorption? What occurs then? Is the energy ignobly dumped into space as if the universe exists as a gigantic garbage dump of semi-processed and regurgitated energy? If so, then what if another particle happens to travel across it? Would it accidentally pick it up while absorbing other force carriers at that location?
Whatever processes are involved with converting field energy into resident kinetic energy, the absorption process would have to be fairly quick in order to process the vast multitude of force carriers that exist at any given location. Just think about it. Every force carrier would have to be processed independently, without interfering with others and uniquely processed, one after another at incredible speed.
When considering the enormous number of fields that exist at any given location, some would say that it is nearly impossible for an error not to occur during this incredible amount of processing. Especially, when considering the unknown number of distant fields that are not strong enough to overcome a particle's inertia that are processed, but not observed by motion.
Not to mention other possible errors such as: velocity (higher velocities may result in less time to process all the fields at a particular location), alignment of kinetic energy's vector compared to the absorbed energy's vector (similar/differing alignments may result in faster/slower processing), saturation of the particle due to kinetic energy's density (making it easier/difficult for future absorption), weaker fields piggybacking off of stronger fields (when two or more fields are accidentally absorbed simultaneously), etc. Perhaps, a healthy margin of error should be considered when evaluating such things on a cosmic scale.
While considering these errors, there also may be an overriding issue with the local group of fields having priority compared to the more distant fields. Or, that the distant fields are only semi-processed, or perhaps not processed at all, due to time constraints.
The multitude of variations due to these effects may result in floating "phantom zones" occurring in space where entities seem to be affected by something that doesn't actually exist, but appear to do so. In that, entities may be affected in a greater or lesser manner than what they normally should for that particular location in space.
Could this be the reason for the shift towards the Great Attractor? Or dark matter? Or different ages of the universe?
How does the classical nature of bubble theory reflect the structure of the atom?
In my quantum-relativistic ether model, the formation of the atomic shells or energy levels is due to a peculiar bubble formation caused by the proton's/antiproton's three-quark combination.
The quarks are aligned such that their aggregate bubble formation propagates outward in a spiral-like fashion that alternates between the two different zones of sliding (forward-/cross-sliding zones). Electrons forward-slide to a higher/lower shell when bubble interference patterns dictate such (due to the change in the energized particle's bubble field), and cross-slide within the respective shell layer generating the appropriate wave effect (electron cloud phenomenon).
The one-to-one pairing of a proton and electron along with the photon emission, however, is due to another effect that is described below when discussing dark matter.
How does this classical model take into account the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?
A particle's wavelength bubble establishes a "random" condition in a system since a particle's position changes within whenever the entity moves forward. This causes the particle's location to be uncertain within a given system even though the process is intrinsically deterministic by nature.
For an analogy how a random condition like this may be natively deterministic is somewhat similar to how the interior of a planet may reverse its magnetic poles. Depending upon the particular makeup of the magma, the mineral composition at the time determines the specific alignment of the planet's magnetic field. Similarly, certain internal processes may be involved that affects a particle's decision to move in a "random" direction within the wavelength bubble whenever it moves forward. It appears to be uncertain, but in truth, is intrinsically deterministic if knowledge of the internal mechanism is known.
However, uncertainty in the sense of being a native undefined physical state in quantum systems is invalid, and such may be shown to be nonsensical simply by considering the following philosophical argument.
At the time of a particle's fabrication, the parent process (particle/environment) would know the properties of the newly created child since the parent is directly responsible for establishing the child its characteristics. It would be wrong to assume that the child originally existed in an undefined state since the parent had already performed an observation of the child's properties by bestowing such to it (measurement was performed).
Since the parent process performs a thorough observation of the child's properties and characteristics in their entirety, the measurement is more complete and comprehensive than any other form of observation that has ever been performed. It is irrelevant if the parent observation is removed from consideration (e.g., particle annihilation), which is similar if the first observer of Schrodinger's cat doesn't inform a second observer of the results, the system does not reset to an undefined state for the second observer. Once an observation has been performed, measurement has its effect.
Since the properties of the child are well known and fully measured at the moment of its creation, it cannot natively exist in an undefined state.
The only uncertainty that applies to a given situation would be the human observer's lack of knowledge. Not that uncertainty intrinsically exists at the particle level, nor would a human's observation be able to physically alter that state for the universe in any way.
Keep in mind that this parent argument is not intended to prove that the universe is deterministic in nature since my quantum-relativistic ether model accomplishes that effort. Instead, the intent of this parent argument is to present a viable contradiction to the uncertainty principle at its most fundamental level, that of the origin of the undefined state.
If the uncertainty principle is inherently flawed then how may one simultaneously measure both the position and momentum of a particle?
A simultaneous measurement of a particle's position and momentum may be successfully accomplished if the photons were properly aligned for the experiment.
A non-demolishing measurement is possible if the emitters were aligned such that each would offset the other’s recoil of the target through the simultaneous emission of the photons. By using counteracting photons, the recoil of the target would cancel to allow for a simultaneous measurement of both position and momentum. The recoil is just kinetic energy after all.
The advantage that my model may offer to this situation is that by collapsing the individual wavelength bubbles, any misalignment of the components with each other would be kept at a minimum.
If this was not taken into consideration, a successful simultaneous measurement may still be accomplished by the repetition of trial and error in order to attain the proper alignment and synchronization of the entire system. Also, conducting a nano experiment near absolute zero would help minimize misalignment as well.
How does bubble theory relate to the expansion of the universe?
Any model that accounts for the expansion of the universe needs to provide the means for solving the following: Hubble's constant, role of gravity, accelerated expansion, and why the expansion of space doesn't produce a cosmological redshift with gravity.
Surprisingly, the expansion of the universe within the bubble environment may be easily understood when considering the geological concept of plate tectonics. I know that sounds strange and highly unlikely, just bear with me until you've read this entire Q&A page to understand why it is relevant.
If the upper layer of the quantum-relativistic ether was structured similarly to the tectonic plates upon a planet's surface, such may be resolved as follows:
1) Hubble’s constant is reflected by the growth rate of the newly created space of additional plates
2) Gravity, by acting indirectly through matter residing on top of the ether, pulls the plates together and if strong enough, prevents the emergence of new space in-between them
3) Accelerated expansion is not only due to gravity becoming weaker the further bodies are separated, but also that the environmental repulsion between plates increases due to the greater number of newly created plates in-between them. If expansion ever slows down, it may be due to excessive plate
formation pushing back as negative pressure, pocket inflation starting to form, and/or dark matter
interacting through the plates [more in the next section]
4) Cosmological redshift doesn't occur for gravity due to expansion being limited to only the upper ether
layer of which gravity does not reside (expansion is not across all ether layers) [more in the last section]
During the Big Bang, the universe was hot enough that particles couldn't form due to kinetic energy's density being greater than a particle's internal binding (particles and kinetic energy existed in a merged liquefied matter state). Since the expansion of space was unimpeded due to the lack of gravity being felt by the liquefied matter, it expanded rapidly as an inflationary period that physically diluted the composition such that the density of kinetic energy was reduced enough to allow particles to form.
When particles materialized, force carriers became relevant and the early inflationary period was affected by weakly interactive forces. At the time, all matter in the universe existed in a peculiar condensate state that was a massive aggregate bubble zone that induced sliding. This caused the force carriers to have a greater probability for sliding that made them all weakly interactive (similar to the neutrino mentioned earlier).
For the most part, this resulted in the lack of a force being felt by matter that permitted the rapid and unimpeded separation of the tectonic plates during inflation. However, an irregular separation of the plates occurred since some force was felt at times due to the weakly interactive forces (irregular probabilities due to conflicting bubble patterns). This had the effect of some gravity being felt at times that affected the overall irregular distribution of the tectonic plates themselves.
Both of these effects combined, of all forces being weakly interactive due to enhanced sliding from the condensate formation and the irregular distribution of the underlying plate formations, resulted in the asymmetrical conglomeration of the galaxies found in today's universe.
How does this new theory consider dark matter?
Dark matter may not be a separate entity as commonly thought, but actually is an extension of ordinary matter that reaches into the lower ether layers. What we know as an electron is actually only the topmost representation of a continuous blob that extends into the lower ether layers as a single object. This blob particle that exists across multiple ether layers is what we know of as dark matter.
What we observe as the "gravitational pull" by dark matter is actually due to the blob's lower extension having an effect on the upper reaches of itself as ordinary matter. Of ordinary matter appearing to be pushed/pulled rather than the actual absorption of kinetic energy from a field, which results in motion for an entity without a change in its kinetic energy.
What we observe as quantum fluctuations are actually caused by the undulations at lower ether layers that cause blob tendrils to extend upward into the topmost layer (i.e., "matter suddenly appears out of thin air"). When particles annihilate each other due to matter-antimatter interactions, they free their lower extensions of themselves that contribute to the overall collection of dark matter in the region that exists without an upper layer representation.
Quantum entanglement effects are caused by matter being physically connected to each other through their lower-layered blob extensions (acting collectively as a whole). So, all entanglement effects are handled in this classical model.
The blob layer is also the reason for the mysterious Great Attractor shift. For the Dipole Repeller region, the eventual elimination of blob material in the area will result in preventing ordinary matter from existing in the upper ether layer, which will cause the lack of gravity being felt in the region. This may cause a localized inflationary event in the future (i.e. pocket inflation). After all, the blob's quantum fabrication tendrils acting through the upper layer's plate tectonics are what is holding space together for us at the top level.
The blob layer also provides insight into particle decay. A free neutron by itself takes about fourteen minutes to break apart but how is this done? As the upper ether representation of a neutron is binding, their lower portions are more loosely assembled and are affected by neighboring blob undulations. As neighboring motions pulls them apart, it also pries apart their upper layer representation that causes the neutron to decay. The effect of pairing with a proton fuses their blob tendrils together which prevents further separation (as a carbon control rod of sorts). So, the proton's effect provides the difference of a neutron decaying in just a few minutes into being stable for the life of the universe (as a non-quantum entanglement association). My multilayered ether model is the only one that provides an explanation for this difference.
The variations of the other decay rates are due to their blob extensions interacting with the aggregate blob collective (planet or otherwise). However, the very brief decay rates are actually caused by another ether construct called a nucleon bag that coats protons/neutrons and extends to other nuclei, or fails to do so for the quick decay. The nucleon bag exerts greater force when stretched at a distance, so the strong force is actually an ether construct that populates upward as a blob tendril (appears as a force carrier on the upper ether layer). Which explains why the force becomes greater at a distance. Another first that only my model handles correctly.
The blob layer also provides a clearer explanation how atoms are formed. The blob extensions of protons and electrons link up together in the lower ether layer that ensures a one-to-one pairing (as if the nucleus was a sprawling sea urchin catching electron blob tendrils). Adding protons stretches some blob tendrils to reach further (outer shells) that have smaller-sized receptors (tendrils are less dense) to reflect why higher shells permit higher energy levels. The outermost valence shell/blob is not as compressed or well-formed as the others which provides some degree of flexibility for the electrons. The density of the proton tendrils in the nucleus determines the specific energy boundaries of the atomic shells that are further defined by the alternating bubble-sliding zones as described earlier.
As for the photon emission, there are different possibilities (all of which may occur):
1) [Collision] The energized electron separates from its original proton tendril then connects to a lower
leveled tendril sometimes from being caught by the alternating bubble sliding zone's shell formation
(of which the collision with the lower tendril triggers a resultant reverberation that produces a photon
blob transmission of the appropriate energy level) [energized electron retains its higher kinetic energy
state when it drops shell layers (which is unconventional thought) that is then conveyed by colliding
(being caught) by the lower tendril that produces the photon blob reverberation]
2) [Proton Exchange] The energized electron remains attached to its original proton tendril that temporarily
stretches the tendril to a higher shell layer (causing an extra proton tendril at that higher shell), and at
some point, one of the electrons at the higher shell, bubble slides to a lower level that causes the two
proton tendrils between shells to forcibly switch places producing a photon blob transmission (as if
the nucleus' tendrils violently exchanged places due to the force of the electron's bubble slide (tunnel),
which is a jerking motion) [energized electron may retain its higher kinetic energy state when it drops
shell layers though the photon reverberation is actually caused by the two proton tendrils forcibly
exchanging places and is proportional to the tendrils' density]
3) [Foundation] The energized electron remains attached to its original proton tendril that is stretched to
a higher shell layer, after the interplay of the electrons at the higher shell reaching equilibrium, one
of the electrons eventually drops to a lower shell layer (not from the electron's action but due to the
proton tendrils rearranging themselves to fill the exposed gap within the nucleus' foundation) [energized
electron loses its higher kinetic energy state before it drops shell layers and the act of a proton tendril
compressing from an elongated form to the lower shell when filling in the nucleus' foundation gap is
what produces the photon reverberation at the appropriate energy due to the change in tendril density]
The third case (foundation) is the more commonly understood behavior of the atom that any electron, when loses its higher energy state (kinetic energy), drops to a lower energy band automatically, not from it's own action, but rather due to hidden variables acting behind the scenes as mysterious "quantum states". There may be other explanations for the photon's emission than the above possibilities that may be discovered with further research of the blob layer.
In the past, dark matter was previously thought of as something that only caused gravity. What an enormous mistake that was, it is so much more in my multilayered ether model of the universe.
What is the future of the quantum-relativistic ether model as a true Theory of Everything?
A true Theory of Everything has to provide an explanation how motion occurs in the universe. At the kinetic energy level of magnification, true motion may not actually occur since the constituent of kinetic energy would require kinetic energy, in of itself, to articulate its own motion. So, how does kinetic energy's constituent move if it requires itself to achieve its own motion?
To avoid this paradox, a new concept called stationary-motion (that of achieving motion without actually physically moving) would have to be derived by the Theory of Everything model.
For an analogy of stationary-motion, consider a pasture of tall grass in which a gust of wind caused patterns to develop upon the grassy surface. The various floating images that form may appear to move about and interact with each other, but they do so without the grass stalks physically moving from their rooted locations. Or, another analogy would be to view the entire universe as a cathode ray monitor where the pixels remained fixed in place, and the images appearing on the screen are artificially induced, but the pixels themselves never physically move from their fixed locations.
In my version of a true Theory of Everything, the universe exists as a three-dimensional, multilayered ether continuum that interacts with itself on a multilevel basis. The patterns that emerge on the topmost layer are achieved through interactions that manifest as ripples or vibrations throughout the ether continuum. The resultant patterns that "appear" on the topmost ether layer are what we know as particles, kinetic energy, and space (all of which consist of ether constituents), however, the ether itself doesn't actually physically move or alter in size.
What we know as motion by particles is artificially simulated by the resultant ether layers interacting with each other that derives the effect of stationary-motion (somewhat similar to a computer graphics program that combines multiple picture frames to produce an image). An unusual view but this may be the only way to resolve the paradox regarding how the constituent of kinetic energy may move without requiring another form of kinetic energy to articulate its own motion.
When string theory is advanced into being three-dimensional (multiple ether layers replacing the effects of extra dimensions), incorporating kinetic energy's constituent into the model will result in the development of mini-strings. Mini-strings will have a communal shared property to reflect how kinetic energy behaves in a continuum where the mini-strings don't actually move from their locations, but rather convey motion as a communal property to neighboring mini-strings (as pixels in a stationary-motion environment). Mini-strings are integrated in the continuum as ether constituents, sharing communal effects across multiple ether layers. This is the basis of a Theory of Everything model.
For the remaining part of this page, such low-level detail won't be presented due to the difficulty in explaining events as multileveled pixels in a continuum.
When one considers that the universe is a static and multilayered ether (expansion is only an upper layer effect), such may solve certain phenomena as how the forces don't experience a reduction through space, the mystery behind dark matter (as described above), how nuclear fusion works (with iron being the distinguishing turning point), how faster-than-light interstellar travel may be possible, and other unresolved events.
For example, how the forces may retain their integrity through space may be easier understood with this model. The issue is why a force like gravity is not reduced by the diffraction caused by interposing objects between the source of the field and its absorber. As in why the Sun's gravity is not reduced for the Earth when the propagation of the gravitational field may be diffracted by Mercury or Venus.
Having the opinion that source points don't actually exist for fields in quantum field theories (as a futuristic quantum-gravity), still has the issue of how to resolve gravity's inverse square dispersion. Since all waves in quantum mechanics are reduced in energy when stretched over an increased area (redshifted), diffraction caused by an interposing object should likewise result in a reduction of the force to no longer adhere to its inverse square ratio, but such is not observed.
With diffraction, it doesn't matter if the propagating means of gravity is a particle, wave, or something else that causes an excitation in a quantum field, stretching the propagation signal over an increased area will always reduce its strength. Even though shorter than interstellar distances may make the redshift unnoticeable, a reduction still occurs for all diffracted effects. So, how does a force like gravity retain the integrity of its inverse square dispersion regardless of any interposing objects?
Solving this is simple if the universe is considered to be a multilayered ether. In my model, force carriers physically exist at a lower ether layer than ordinary matter and are never actually absorbed. They only convey energy from a lower layer to a higher one as if they were ring-shaped entities. Since force carriers exist on a lower layer and are undisturbed, they may freely propagate through space without being affected by interposing objects on an upper layer. So, gravity is never diffracted or reduced in energy.
Similarly, the expansion of space doesn't produce a cosmological redshift with gravity since the universe's expansion is an upper layer effect only, not across all ether layers (as described above with plate tectonics). So, gravity is not reduced by the expansion of space either. My multilayered ether model is the only one that handles both of these situations correctly regarding the inverse square propagation of a force.
In present-day experiments, what is thought of as force carriers is actually the unabsorbed energy from the lower layer since the liquified matter (dissolution of matter+kinetic energy) in the collider doesn't interact with the force, and the leftover result is subsequently captured by the detector. Much like how the early universe's state of liquified matter didn't absorb force carriers at the time that contributed to inflation.
With that being said, it may be possible to detect a graviton in an experiment with a more refined liquified matter state in the collider. In other words, rather than slamming protons together that may result in an imperfect liquified form, perhaps, it would be better to use an electron-positron annihilation that will produce a more refined liquified state. Which should be better than a proton/anti-proton annihilation that may not be refined enough from an imperfect collision. Then it will only be an issue of increasing kinetic energy enough to "squeeze the sponge's holes" to the degree that the graviton would not be absorbed or processed by the compressed liquified matter formation.
Regarding the next topic, why iron is the distinguishing turning point for fusion may be easier understood with my model as well. The ether provides a certain level of buoyancy for objects (similar to a ship's bow wave in water) that results in a bubble-like formation, or fusion bubble, for the elements. Iron being too heavy to "float" is the distinguishing turning point when the fusion bubble fails to materialize, and has no effect. Or rather, the ether still forms the fusion bubble for iron and heavier elements, but it's in a flattened state. A disturbance or destruction of this fusion bubble produces the energy release of nuclear fusion.
On a cosmic scale, the fusion bubble is also what produces supernova explosions. Within a star, fusion bubbles are spread out far enough that they don't interfere with each other. However, the sudden and rapid collapse of a dying star causes a tsunami-like accumulation of fusion bubbles, which are then "stepped on" by the iron core. This is what causes supernovas to explode. The neutrinos are just an aftereffect of the blob world's extension into the upper ether layer. A portion of this tsunami-sized fusion bubble is responsible for collapsing the iron core into a black hole. The reason why some iron cores don't become black holes is due to the various interferences/delays associated with the lower-layered blob world (imperfect implosion of core). Pretty simple with the correct model of the universe.
On the subject of interstellar travel, if a layperson asked how this new theory may achieve faster-than-light travel through space, an advanced spacecraft may be designed with the following in mind. Since every object's motion causes a ripple in the ether (much like how a lily pad or frog causes a ripple upon a pond's surface), the ripple wave's vibration causes kinetic energy to adjust itself via micro-sliding to ensure that the speed of light is constant. Essentially, kinetic energy remaining true to itself to always travel at light speed.
This occurs naturally and is how every particle on Earth experiences the same reference frame adjustment whenever a ripple caused by the motion of objects travels thru the planet. The trick is to take advantage of this naturally occurring phenomenon and use it as the primary means of propulsion through space (by allowing the reference frame adjustment to do all the work for you).
A clever engineer would surmise that such a means is possible by positioning emitters that are directed inward towards the spacecraft in order to cause ripples strong enough to trigger the micro-sliding effect for every particle. Essentially, causing the craft to momentarily travel at faster-than-light speeds, whether it is hovering in place (counteracting gravity), or moving forward (as a futuristic warp drive). Which is a pretty slick means of propulsion without rocket engines or their fuel.
In summary, a true Theory of Everything needs to consider not only how to successfully unify relativity with quantum mechanics by the same means (kinetic energy sliding), but also all of the above as well. Of particular importance is the need to incorporate the constituent of kinetic energy since the means of handling motion and placement in systems is essential for any unified model.
bottom of page