top of page

True Citizenship

Issue
 
   Nations grant citizenship when people are deemed worthy of becoming a permanent resident, however, such may be rescinded if conduct violates the principles of being a citizen.

   Corrective action may be carried out by the nation voting upon the matter regarding the fate of an entire population, similar to how the court of public opinion measure could be used by the United Nations regarding the international victims compensation effort.

   Even though the problem of having non-complying citizens may be a concern for any nation, the following are a few examples of violations in America that may result in explusion for the group of offenders.
Hispanics

   The Hispanic population may have violated the terms of citizenship in America regarding the responsibility to respect and obey federal, state, and local laws.

   One possible manner in which the Hispanic population may have violated the terms of citizenship is their general support for illegal immigration. Aiding and abetting those who have crossed the border illegally, is a felony in itself. By showing the support of such conduct violates the terms of citizenship in this country that requires citizens to uphold the laws, not violate them.

  Another possible violation by the Hispanic population is their promotion of the Spanish language. Even though English was not legally established as the official language in America until recently, it was always considered to be as such across the country. By encouraging Spanish in various ways (e.g., product labeling, voting ballots, ATMs, television broadcasts, etc.), it shows that the Hispanic population was disrespectful towards other nationalities. Behaving in such a manner is contrary to being an American citizen who treats all nationalities and people in equal measure.

   Another possible violation is the Hispanic population's voting record. In particular, by consistently voting against candidates who oppose illegal immigration or non-Hispanic issues. Such intent is a form of obstruction of justice since this behavior is meant to prevent government officials from performing their duties properly.

   Another possible violation is the Hispanic population's support for relocating jobs to other nations, in particular, Mexico and South America through trade agreements (e.g., NAFTA). By showing favor towards another country, such behavior is contrary to the rules of citizenship which requires to uphold America in the highest regard and not have allegiance to other countries.
 
Blacks

   The Black population may have violated the terms of citizenship in America on numerous occasions.

   A possible violation may be their racist acts upon others. Normally, racism by itself is not grounds for dismissal from the country (since it's just an opinion), however, racism to the degree that the Black population has committed over the years has been excessive in nature, and contrary to being an American citizen.

   Racist organizations such as the Miss Black America pageant, NAACP, Black Lives Matter, BET channel, Jet magazine, Black History Month, black colleges, black Jesus Christ, etc., all show that the Black population has a serious racism issue. Such widespread racism to this degree is problematic and affects other situations as if serving jury duty by black people may cause hidden discriminatory concerns based on race.

   Racism is also prevalent among blacks with their voting record of consistently deciding in favor of black candidates, such as Barack Obama among others. In 2008, as much as 96% of black people voted for Obama even though the candidate's policies offered little for that community. Even the chair of the Republican National Committee (who was black) mentioned that he was stuck between voting for a member of his own party, or the opposition party's black candidate.

   At that time and others, the consensus among black people was that they had willingly voted based upon the candidate's race. Skin color should never be a consideration when deciding who to vote for in this country. The Justice Department should have condemned such outspoken and abhorrent racism by threatening to file criminal charges against the entire Black community for racial discrimination of a federal post.

   Bribery, a similar crime in which one's vote is coerced in some manner, carries a prison penalty of up to 30 years for federal cases. When considering the number of infractions that black voters have committed over the years by their racist views, the Black population should have been imprisoned or face exile for violating the terms of citizenship in this country.

   Instead, such racist conduct was deemed acceptable and even considered to be normal within the Black community. The excessive level of racism among the Black population has been an embarrassing part of America's history that also endangered public safety.

   For example, the dehumanization of law enforcement personnel by the Black population in recent years has shown the general disrespect for the laws of this country. It seems that whenever a police officer apprehends a Black suspect who is resisting arrest, the Black population automatically decides in favor of the unruly suspect instead of law enforcement. It doesn't matter what the offense is, or whether the law enforcement officer is justified in defending him/herself from harm, the Black population consistently decides in favor of the black suspect regardless of the situation.

   By choosing to support those who break the law (resist arrest), rather than law enforcement is a clear violation of the terms of citizenship that require individuals to uphold the law. Not favor those who violate it. The issue of using excessive force by law enforcement personnel whether justified or not is a secondary matter.

   What is important is that all citizens are required to support law enforcement and the court of law at all times if they want to remain citizens of the country. This was not demonstrated by the Black population with their violent protests and riots throughout the country. The willful destruction of property and serious harm to others during the riots should have been condemned as domestic terrorism by the Justice Department.

   Furthermore, the disagreement with the courts' decision to dismiss charges (or not to file) against law enforcement personnel only further demonstrates that the Black population has failed to show support for the court of law (which is yet another violation of the terms of citizenship).

   If that wasn't bad enough, the defund the police agenda only further worsened the situation since it endangered public safety nationwide. By acting in a manner that is not in the best interests of the nation (by decreasing police presence or slowing their reaction to crime), such an agenda places public safety at risk which is another violation of citizenship.

   Throughout the years, the Black population's extreme racism and unruly behavior has repeatedly violated the terms of citizenship in this country. To be a citizen is to uphold and respect the laws of the nation. To those who do not act accordingly, such conduct may considered to be in violation, and justifies their dismissal.
Muslims

   The Muslim population may have violated the terms of citizenship unknowingly. The issue of concern is regarding the Islamic doctrine of where such policies are in contrast to America's laws and customs.

   For example, the Islamic custom for females to cover themselves so that males would not be tempted is actually a serious offense in America. A fundamental principle in America is that all people, both male and female, should be treated equally and fairly. Behaving otherwise would be in direct contrast to America's principles and values.

   If a particular religious doctrine is opposed to this ideal, then people of that religion should not become citizens since they would be unable to fulfill the terms of citizenship. The freedom of religion mandate has lower precedence compared to satisfying the higher ideal and obligations of upholding the primary principle in America in that all people are considered equal.

   This is just one example of how the Islamic doctrine prevents upholding the terms of citizenship in this country, and justifies their dismissal.
Jews

   The Jewish population may have also violated the terms of citizenship unknowingly.

   The issue of concern is that their religious doctrine specifies protecting Israel at all costs, including sacrificing their lives if necessary. By viewing another country in higher regard is in direct contrast to fulfilling the terms of citizenship that requires to place America above all others (and not have allegiance elsewhere).

   Which is similar to the reason why dual citizenships should be revoked in order to satisfy the terms of citizenship in the country.
Anti-Americans

   The anti-American behavior of burning the American flag may be of concern because the situation is not actually about the freedom of speech.

   Citizenship requires that one must hold the country (and symbols thereof) in the highest regard of respect. So much so, in fact, that one is required to sacrifice one's life in order to defend the country if necessary.

   However, if a person stomps, spits, burns, or defaces the flag in some manner while saying that America is not their country, how may they fulfill these terms of citizenship? Is such behavior grounds for dismissal?
bottom of page