top of page
True Citizenship
Issue
Even though the possibility of violating the terms of citizenship may be a concern for any nation, the following are a few examples that should be addressed in America.
Hispanics
The Hispanic population may have violated the terms of citizenship regarding their responsibility to respect and obey the laws of the country.
One possible concern is their promotion of the Spanish language. Even though English was not legally established as the official language in America until recently, it was always considered to be as such for the nation. By encouraging Spanish in various ways (e.g., product labeling, voting ballots, ATMs, television broadcasts, etc.), it shows that the Hispanic population is being disrespectful towards the other nationalities. Which is contrary to America's principle in that all people should be treated in equal manner.
A more serious matter is their voting record in that they consistently voted against candidates who opposed Hispanic-related issues. For example, if a federal judge or governor ran on the premise of having more secure borders from illegal immigrants, the Hispanic population would overwhelmingly vote against that candidate. The intent to disrupt matters in this manner is actually a form of obstruction of justice since the effort is meant to prevent officials from performing their duties effectively.
Another possible violation of failing to uphold the terms of citizenship in this country is their support for outsourcing jobs to Hispanic nations through trade agreements (e.g., NAFTA). Showing favor towards another country at the detriment of America is contrary to the terms of citizenship that requires to uphold the country in the highest regard, and not have allegiance towards others.
Their most serious offense, however, is their continued support for aiding and abetting illegal border crossings. Harboring and providing sanctuary for Hispanics who enter the country illegally was done with the full knowledge that such conduct was in violation of federal law. Behaving in this manner violates the terms of citizenship that requires all citizens to uphold the laws of the country at all times, and not violate them.
Overall, if an ethic population has repeatedly violated the terms of citizenship in this country, should they be held responsible collectively as a whole and have their citizenships rescinded? In a pure democracy, voters will need to decide their fate.
Blacks
The Black population has violated the terms of citizenship on numerous occasions.
One possible violation is their repeated acts of racism. Normally, racism by itself is not grounds for dismissal since it's just an opinion, however, racism to the degree that the Black population has committed over the years has been excessive in nature, and contrary to being an American citizen.
Certain organizations and activities that reflect racist behavior such as the Miss Black America pageant, NAACP, Black Lives Matter, BET channel, Jet magazine, Black History Month, black colleges, black Jesus Christ, etc., all represent that the Black population has a serious racism issue. Such widespread racism to this degree is problematic and when it becomes so commonplace in society, it also affects other situations as well (e.g., black people serving jury duty often results in biased opinions).
Racism is clearly prevalent with their voting record of consistently deciding in favor of black candidates. In Barack Obama's 2008 campaign, as much as 96% of black people voted for Obama even though the candidate's policies offered little for that community. Even the chair of the Republican National Committee (who was black) mentioned that he was stuck between voting for a member of his own party, or the opposition party's black candidate.
The consensus among black people during that time among others was that they had willingly, and quite blatantly, voted based on race. Skin color should never be a consideration when deciding who to vote for in this country. The Justice Department should have condemned such outspoken and abhorrent racism by threatening to file charges against the Black community for discriminating against others in this manner.
Bribery, a similar crime in which one's vote is coerced in some manner, carries a prison penalty of up to 30 years for federal cases. When considering the number of infractions that black voters have committed over the years, they should have faced decades of imprisonment for repeatedly having their vote coerced in an immoral manner. Either that or make bribery legal in America to avoid the double standard.
However, instead of condemnation, such racist conduct was deemed acceptable and even considered to be normal within the Black community. This widespread level of racism by the Black population has been an embarrassing and disgraceful part of America's history.
Racism of this magnitude involving criminal conduct also endangers public safety. For example, their dehumanization of law enforcement personnel has shown their general disrespect for upholding the laws in this country. It seems that whenever a police officer apprehends a black suspect who is resisting arrest, the Black population automatically decides in favor of the unruly suspect instead of law enforcement. It doesn't matter what the offense is, or whether the officer is justified in defending him/herself from harm, the Black population consistently decides in favor of the black suspect regardless of the situation.
Supporting those who resist arrest rather than law enforcement is a violation that requires all individuals to uphold the law, not favor those who violate it. The issue of excessive force by law enforcement, whether justified or not, is a secondary matter.
What is important is that the citizens of this country are required to support law enforcement at all times. This was not demonstrated by the Black population with their violent protests and riots throughout the nation. The willful destruction of property with the intent to do harm should have been condemned as domestic terrorism by the Justice Department. Not tolerated by the officials.
The Black population's contention with the courts that dismissed charges or didn't file charges against law enforcement further demonstrates that they have repeatedly failed to show support for the rule of law. Threatening to "burn down the city" if the court doesn't rule in favor of the black suspect is clearly immoral. This behavior was repeated and supported by others in the Black community without apology or remorse.
If that wasn't bad enough, the Defund the Police movement only further worsened the situation since it endangered public safety nationwide. By acting in a manner that is not in the best interests of the nation (by decreasing police presence or slowing their reaction to crimes), placed public safety at risk, and is contrary to being a citizen.
Overall, the Black population's racism and unruly behavior has repeatedly violated the terms of citizenship in America. To be a citizen is to uphold and respect the laws of the nation. To those who do not act accordingly, even if it means ruling against an entire population, such conduct is in violation of citizenship, and justifies their dismissal.
Especially, when considering that the original Africans, and their descendants of today, should have never been granted citizenship in America. If President James Monroe (1817-1825) was successful in his effort to deport slaves back to Africa with the American Colonization Society, the question of their citizenship wouldn't be an issue today. Even President Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865) mentioned that he preferred to free the slaves and deport them back to Africa as part of a colonization effort, but didn't do so because he was worried about their health and well-being. Not because the African descendants deserved or were justified in becoming American citizens.
When this is combined with the Black population's unruly behavior that poses a risk to public safety (e.g., favoring criminal conduct that resists arrest, opposing court's decisions, nationwide rioting, racist/coerced voting, aggressiveness towards law enforcement, Defund the Police movement, etc.), such conduct warrants their dismissal. A pure democracy vote by the nation will determine their fate.
Even if the nation ignores the public safety aspect for some reason, the Black population's voting record alone will imprison them for several decades when referencing bribery for federal offenses that involve the President, federal judges, etc. Either that or they may face exile for their collective behavior.
Muslims
The Muslim population may have unknowingly violated the terms of citizenship in America. The issue of concern is that the Islamic doctrine may be in contrast to the country's laws and customs.
For example, the Islamic custom for females to cover themselves so that males would not be tempted by them is contrary to being a citizen. A fundamental principle in America is that all people, both male and female, should be treated equally and fairly at all times. Behaving otherwise is in direct contrast to the country's principles and values.
If a particular religious doctrine is opposed to this ideal then people of that religion should not become citizens since they will be unable to fulfill the terms of citizenship. The freedom of religion mandate has lower precedence compared to the higher obligations and requirements of the primary principle in America, in that, all people are considered equal.
If a religious doctrine like Islam prevents a person from fulfilling the terms of citizenship in this country, their dismissal is justified.
Jews
The Jewish population may have violated the terms of citizenship unknowingly.
The issue of concern is that their religious doctrine requires protecting Israel at all costs, including sacrificing their lives if necessary. Viewing another country in higher regard is in direct contrast to fulfilling the terms of citizenship in this country to not have allegiance elsewhere. If a religious doctrine is in contrast to fulfilling the terms of citizenship then such are grounds for dismissal.
Anti-Americans
Burning the flag is common practice in anti-American demonstrations, but this activity is of concern because the situation is not actually about the freedom of speech argument. Citizenship requires that one must hold the country, and symbols thereof, in the highest regard of respect. So much so, that one is required to defend the country with their life if necessary. However, if a person stomps, spits, burns, or defaces the flag in some manner while saying that America is not their country, how may they fulfill these terms of citizenship? Such are grounds for dismissal.
Summary
Some may say that a pure democracy vote to exile an entire group of people would be harsh corrective action, however, not addressing the issue of violating the terms of citizenship would be an even greater problem for the country.
On an international level, the United Nations needs to consider if dual (or multi) citizenships should continue since having allegiance to another country causes similar problems as mentioned above.
In America's situation, allowing allegiance to another country has caused: (1) the Hispanic population to support moving jobs to Mexico at the detriment of America's welfare, (2) the Jewish population's support of using America's military to attack Iraq, Iran, and others for the benefit of Israel at the cost of American lives, and (3) at a lower level of importance, allowing immigrants to become citizens even though their only interest is to benefit themselves financially before returning to their native countries (e.g., their intent of becoming citizens is only to stay longer than a work visa permits).
Allowing "fake citizens" to continue would be problematic for nations since such people won't behave as true citizens for their country. The international community can solve this problem by denying dual or multi-citizenships worldwide, and require people to choose with the penalty of being permanently denied citizenship in countries that they renounced as their citizenship.
bottom of page