top of page

True Citizenship

Issue
 
   Even though the possibility of violating the terms of citizenship may be a concern for any nation, the following are a few examples that should be addressed in America.
Hispanics

   The Hispanic population may have violated the terms of citizenship regarding their responsibility to respect and obey the laws of the country.

   One possible concern is their promotion of the Spanish language. Even though English was not legally established as the official language in America until recently, it was always considered to be as such for the nation. By encouraging Spanish in various ways (e.g., product labeling, voting ballots, ATMs, television broadcasts, etc.), it shows that the Hispanic population is being disrespectful towards the other nationalities, which is contrary to America's principle that all people should be treated in equal manner. The issue is not serious enough for dismissal from the country, but it shows that there's an underlying problem with the Hispanic population of not acting accordingly as a true citizen.

   A more serious matter is how they consistently voted against candidates who opposed Hispanic-related issues. For example, if a federal judge or governor ran on the premise of having more secure borders from illegal immigrants, the Hispanic population would overwhelmingly vote against that candidate. Their intent to disrupt matters in this manner is actually a form of obstruction of justice since such is meant to prevent officials from performing their duties effectively.

   Another possible violation is their support for outsourcing jobs to Hispanic nations through trade agreements (e.g., NAFTA). Showing favor towards another country at the detriment of America is contrary to the terms of citizenship that requires to uphold this country in the highest regard, and not have allegiance towards others.

   The most serious offense, however, is their continued support for aiding and abetting illegal border crossings. Harboring and providing sanctuary for other Hispanics who enter the country illegally was done with full knowledge that such conduct was in violation of federal law. Behaving in this manner violates the terms of citizenship that requires all citizens to uphold the laws of the country, and not violate them.

   Overall, if an ethic population has repeatedly violated the terms of citizenship in the country, should they be held responsible collectively as a whole and have their citizenships rescinded? In a pure democracy, voters will need to decide.
Blacks

   The Black population has violated the terms of citizenship on numerous occasions.

   One possible violation is their repeated acts of racism. Normally, racism by itself is not grounds for dismissal since it's just an opinion, however, racism to the degree that the Black population has committed over the years has been excessive in nature, and contrary to being an American citizen.

   Certain organizations and events that reflect racist behavior such as the Miss Black America pageant, NAACP, Black Lives Matter, BET channel, Jet magazine, Black History Month, black colleges, black Jesus Christ, etc., all represent that the Black population has a serious racism issue. Such widespread racism to this degree is problematic and when it becomes so commonplace in society, it affects other situations as well (e.g., black people serving jury duty often results in biased opinions).

   Their racism is clearly prevalent with their voting record of consistently deciding in favor of black candidates. In Barack Obama's 2008 campaign, as much as 96% of black people voted for Obama even though the candidate's policies offered little for that community. Even the chair of the Republican National Committee (who was black) mentioned that he was stuck between voting for a member of his own party, or the opposition party's black candidate.

   The consensus among black people during that time among others was that they had willingly, and quite blatantly, voted based on race. Skin color should never be a consideration when deciding who to vote for in this country. The Justice Department should have condemned such outspoken and abhorrent racism by threatening to file charges against the Black community for discriminating against others in this manner.

   Bribery, a similar crime in which one's vote is coerced in some manner, carries a prison penalty of up to 30 years for federal cases. When considering the number of infractions that black voters have committed over the years, they should have faced decades of imprisonment for repeatedly having their vote coerced in an immoral and illegal manner. ​Either that or make bribery legal in America to avoid the double standard.

   However, instead of condemnation such racist conduct was deemed acceptable and even considered to be normal within the Black community. This widespread level of racism by the Black population has been an embarrassing and disgraceful part of America's history.

   Racism of this magnitude also endangers public safety. For example, their dehumanization of law enforcement has shown their general disrespect for upholding the laws in this country. It seems that whenever a police officer apprehends a black suspect who is resisting arrest, the Black population automatically decides in favor of the unruly suspect instead of law enforcement. It doesn't matter what the offense is, or whether the officer is justified in defending him/herself from harm, the Black population consistently decides in favor of the black suspect regardless of the situation.

   Supporting those who resist arrest rather than law enforcement is a violation that requires all individuals to uphold the law, not favor those who violate it. The issue of excessive force by law enforcement, whether justified or not, is a secondary matter.

   What is important is that the citizens of this country are required to support law enforcement at all times. This was not demonstrated by the Black population with their violent protests and riots throughout the nation. The willful destruction of property with the intent to do harm should have been condemned as domestic terrorism by the Justice Department. Not tolerated by the officials.

   The Black population's contention with the courts (that dismissed charges or didn't file charges against law enforcement) demonstrates that they have repeatedly failed to show support for the rule of law. Threatening to "burn down the city" if the court doesn't rule in favor of the black suspect is clearly criminal. This behavior was repeated and supported by others in the Black community without apology or remorse.

   If that wasn't bad enough, the Defund the Police agenda only further worsened the situation since it endangered public safety nationwide. By acting in a manner that is not in the best interests of the nation by decreasing police presence or slowing their reaction to crimes, places public safety at risk and is contrary to being a citizen.

   Overall, the Black population's racism and unruly behavior has repeatedly violated the terms of citizenship in this country. To be a citizen is to uphold and respect the laws of the nation. To those who do not act accordingly, even if it means ruling against an entire population, such conduct is in violation of citizenship and justifies dismissal.
Muslims

   The Muslim population may have unknowingly violated the terms of citizenship in America. The issue of concern is that the Islamic doctrine may be in contrast to the country's laws and customs.

   For example, the Islamic custom for females to cover themselves so that males would not be tempted by them is contrary to being a citizen. A fundamental principle in America is that all people, both male and female, should be treated equally and fairly at all times. Behaving otherwise is in direct contrast to the country's principles and values.

   If a particular religious doctrine is opposed to this ideal then people of that religion should not become citizens since they will be unable to fulfill the terms of citizenship. The freedom of religion mandate has lower precedence compared to the higher obligations and requirements of the primary principle in America, in that, all people are considered equal.

   If a religious doctrine like Islam prevents a person from fulfilling the terms of citizenship in this country, the dismissal is justified.
Jews

   The Jewish population may have violated the terms of citizenship unknowingly.

   The issue of concern is that their religious doctrine requires protecting Israel at all costs, including sacrificing their lives if necessary. Viewing another country in higher regard is in direct contrast to fulfilling the terms of citizenship in this country to not have allegiance elsewhere. If a religious doctrine is in contrast to fulfilling the terms of citizenship of this country, then such are grounds for dismissal.

   [Personal note to the reader] I want to be clear that the intent of these arguments in this section and above is to be fair in handling religious affairs. They are not meant to persecute people who are only trying to live their lives according to their religious beliefs. If you want to blame anyone for the situation, criticize government officials. They're the ones responsible for granting citizenships to religious doctrines that should have been restricted in nature.
Anti-Americans

   Burning the flag is common practice in anti-American demonstrations, but this activity is of concern because the situation is not actually about the freedom of speech argument. Citizenship requires that one must hold the country, and symbols thereof, in the highest regard of respect. So much so, that one is required to defend the country with their life if necessary. However, if a person stomps, spits, burns, or defaces the flag in some manner while saying that America is not their country, how may they fulfill these terms of citizenship? Such are grounds for dismissal.
bottom of page